FloodsBlowing up Mississippi River levee reduced 2011 flood risk
A controversial decision in 2011 to blow up Mississippi River levees reduced the risk of flooding in a city upstream, lowering the height of the rain-swollen river just before it reached its peak, according to a new analysis. “Our model’s not saying the water would have definitely overtopped the levees at Cairo,” says one of the study’s authors. “It doesn’t say it wouldn’t have happened. What we’re saying is that detonation reduced the risk of flooding.” The new research found that allowing those levees to overtop naturally would have resulted in less erosion – so they urge greater control of erosion in future scenarios involving blowing up levees.
A controversial decision in 2011 to blow up Mississippi River levees reduced the risk of flooding in a city upstream, lowering the height of the rain-swollen river just before it reached its peak, according to a newly published computer modeling analysisled by UC Irvinescientists.
The work focused on a Missouri agricultural area called the New Madrid Floodway that was inundated when the levees were detonated. The researchers found that the region would have flooded anyway if the river had been allowed to overtop the levee banks. Separate modeling showed that the resulting damage to crops and buildings would have been similar either way, though the detonations did shift the damage zone toward Missouri and away from Illinois and Kentucky.
A UC Irvine release reportsthat previous studies had reported more than $50 million in levee repair costs as well as damage solely from the rapid flow of water across the floodway after the detonations, which scoured farmland and left behind thick deposits of unwanted sand. The new research found that allowing those levees to overtop naturally would have resulted in less erosion.
Still, the flood risk was reduced for the upstream city — Cairo, Illinois — just as intended.
“Our model’s not saying the water would have definitely overtopped the levees at Cairo,” said UCI professor and chair of civil & environmental engineering Brett Sanders, an author of the study led by UCI graduate student Adam Luke. “It doesn’t say it wouldn’t have happened. What we’re saying is that detonation reduced the risk of flooding.”
Luke built a computer model of the devastating 2011 floods along the Mississippi and Ohio rivers. Then he compared modeling runs conducted both with and without the levee detonations. He discovered that they resulted in a lowering of Mississippi River levels near Cairo by 2.6 feet.
The team also used a separate computer model developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to estimate the costs: more than $250 million in building and crop damage in the flooded area. That’s about $11 million less than it would have been had the levees not been detonated but allowed to overtop without intervention.
The study’s findings support earlier work showing the erosion of flood plains caused by levee bursts, leaving scour holes and sand deposits. With that being a potentially major drawback to flood control by detonation, the authors recommend that engineers place greater emphasis on minimizing erosion when creating such a flood control system.
“Can we design these breaches so there is less scouring and erosion, so we don’t get deposits of sand that require millions of dollars to repair?” Sanders asked.
— Read more in Adam Luke et al., “Hydraulic modeling of the 2011 New Madrid Floodway activation: a case study on floodway activation controls,” Natural Hazards(March 2015) (DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-1680-3)
