view counter

An HS Daily Wire conversation with Walter Hamilton of the International Biometrics Industry Association (IBIA)

not know, the ones we haven’t seen before, who have not stood for background checks.

Hamilton: That could be beneficial. But there’s a counterargument to it. If someone is a would-be terrorist, or wants to recruit someone to do harm, all he has to do is find someone who doesn’t have a record, who doesn’t have a background that would show up negative on a background check. That individual would have no trouble applying for and obtaining a credential, and enjoying privileged movement. There’s a flip side to just about everything.

DW: In a larger context, will you relate this area of concern to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Hamilton: Well, one of the problems we have is, we can’t fight a conventional war against terrorists. This is an asymmetric warfare environment in which you don’t know who the foe is. They don’t wear uniforms. They don’t speak a different language from the population where they’re embedded and you can’t tell who’s who. The only technology that might help you separate the good from the bad is - guess what?

DW: A wild guess. Biometrics.

Hamilton: Exactly right. Look at the city of Fallujah [in the Iraqi province of Al Anbar]. When’s the last time you heard about a terrorist incident involving significant loss of life in Fallujah?

DW: Quite some time.

Hamilton: Over a year, actually. And why’s that? After the second battle of Fallujah, in December 2004, the Marines and the coalition forces inventoried the population and enrolled the legitimate residents into a biometric data base. The people moving into and out of Fallujah can now be checked, at staffed entry points, against a list of legitimate residents using biometrics. Officials need no longer rely on faked ID’s and forged documents but on something that can’t be forged - biometrics.

We all know that the core population in these communities are not terrorists. But the only way to prevent terrorist infiltration into the community is with a biometric system. And one can assume that the law-abiding residents of Fallujah are very happy to supply their biometric samples for those occasions when they have to enter and leave the community. They want to be safe.

DW: Will you say something about the issue of privacy vis-à-vis biometrics, as might occur to people with less pressing concerns about personal safety?

Hamilton: If the issue is invasion of privacy, it’s not biometrics that you need to be concerned about, and

view counter
view counter