Aviation securityQ&A: Full-body scanners
Questions are being raised about the privacy and health aspects of wide use of full-body scanners; here is one example: millimeter wave scanners, in theory, ought to be safer than X-rays because millimeter photons do not have enough energy to break chemical bonds; last year, however, researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory found that while these photons cannot break DNA, they can shake it: this shaking may be so strong that it unzips the two strands in DNA, interfering with the genetic machinery that keeps cells working and healthy
TSA agent stands before a scanner in Washington, D.C. // Source: allianz.com
There appears to be a growing debate over the use of full-body scanners at airport — we say “appears,” because a poll released Tuesday shows the eight out of ten Americans support the use of these scanners. Still, the issue has been raised, and Justin Mullins offers a good discussion of it.
What are full body scanners?
Remember the X-ray specs of science fiction comics that would let people see through walls and clothing? Full body scanners are a bit like them. The scanners take advantage of the fact that at certain wavelengths, electromagnetic waves can pass through clothes but not through the skin, metal or substances such as drugs and explosives.
If your eyes were sensitive to these wavelengths like the scanners, every person you meet would appear naked, with pens, coins, belt buckles and the like magically festooned about their person. You would also be able to see if they were carrying a knife, gun or explosives.
What are the health concerns surrounding them?
There are two main types of full body scanner. One uses X-rays while the other uses lower-energy millimeter wavelengths. X-rays are hazardous because their photons have enough energy to ionize atoms and break chemical bonds. This can cause damage to DNA that subsequently leads to cancer. The machines are deemed safe because the total dose that someone receives during a scan is tiny.
Earlier this year, however, a group of scientists at the University of California, San Francisco, raised a number of concerns over X-ray scanners. They said the X-rays they use are low energy to ensure they bounce only off skin rather than passing through the body, to produce an image focused on objects concealed beneath clothes. This means that the entire dose that the person being scanned receives is concentrated on the skin rather than spread throughout their body. This could mean the skin receives a dose that is one or two orders of magnitude more than expected.
To many observers, the response of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration failed properly to address these concerns.
Are there health concerns surrounding millimeter-wave scanners?
In theory, these ought to be safer than X-rays because millimeter photons do not have enough energy to break chemical bonds. Last year, however, researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico suggested that these low energy photons could damage DNA in an entirely novel way.
They say that while these photons cannot break DNA, they can shake it. This shaking may be so strong that it unzips the two strands in DNA, interfering with the genetic machinery that keeps cells working and healthy.
The team at Los Alamos did their calculations for submillimeter or terahertz waves, whose photons are slightly more energetic than those of millimeter waves. Their results are probabilistic rather than deterministic, they say. This explains why some experiments show that terahertz waves can damage DNA while other, practically identical studies show nothing.
While terahertz full body scanners are not yet widely used, the work does show that the effects of electromagnetic waves on DNA are not fully understood.
Are there alternatives to full body scanners?
Travelers can opt out of being scanned and choose to be frisked instead. In the United States, one group is hoping to highlight the controversy over full body scanners by encouraging everyone traveling on 24 November to elect to be frisked.
What about privacy concerns?
The U.S. Transportation Security Administration admits that the scanners have the ability to store and print images. It says, though, that this capability is used only when the machines are tested and is switched off at all other times. Critics point out that it is not clear how difficult it is to reactivate this capability or how the TSA prevents employees from recording the images with another device such as a cellphone camera.
Earlier this week, hundreds of images taken by a body scanner used by marshals at a courthouse in Florida appeared on the Internet. The TSA says it would be impossible for a similar leak to occur from airport scanners. It’s fair to say the public is yet to be reassured.
